The reason for the obligation to load a full cargo（）that otherwise the Shipowner would lose freight on account of some part of the ship’s carrying capacity not being utilized.

Even where the contract was not made between the master and the consignee，it has been held （）the master maintain an action against consignee upon an implied promise to pay the freight，in considering of his letting the goods out of his hands before payment.

If the master has acted unreasonably，e.g. knowing of the danger in the port has still proceeded to enter it，and danger results，the Charterer will（）.

The Shipowner is not（）by the fact that a remote cause of the loss was an excepted peril.

It may be that，under the contract，freight was made（）to a third person.

The Shipowner is entitled to（）freight if he is ready to deliver at the port of destination the goods which were loaded.

Where a charter-party specifies the estimated time of arrival of a vessel at the port of loading，there is（）obligation on the shipowners to sail to there on the date on which when proceeding with all convenient speed it would normally reach the port on or about the estimated date of arrival.

When the carrier is liable for compensation in respect of loss of or damage to the goods such （）shall be calculated by reference to the invoice value of the goods plus freight charges and insurance if paid.

Where normal delivery at the port of destination is prevented by some cause beyond the control of the master，and the master may and must deal with the cargo for the benefit of its owners by landing it，carrying it，or transshipping it，as may seem best，the Shipowner may then charge the cargo owners with（）to cover the expenses thus incurred in their interests.

When a vessel violates an oil pollution act，who may be held responsible?（）.