The consignee’s refusal to take delivery，or failure to do so within a reasonable time，also puts an end to（）liability as a carrier.

It is not the Charterer’s duty that（）.

The importance of the distinction between a charter by demise and a charter party proper（）that under the former the master is the agent of the Charterer，not of the Shipowner.

The Charterer is entitled to the benefit of the excepted perils during the transit of the goods from storing place to the actual place of loading，provided such transit substantially （）part of the operation of loading.

That the Shipowner has broken a condition precedent will（）the Charterer from the liability to provide a cargo.

Usually the Charterer has to redeliver the ship in the same good order（）when delivered，fair wear and tear excepted.

The right to limit liability in connection with the ship（）also extended to Charterers and any person interested in or in possession of the vessel and，in particular，any manager or operator of her.

Should it appear that war or blockade would prevent the vessel from safely reaching the port of destination and / or discharging the goods thereat，the Carrier（）.

The master’s authority to act in the interests of the cargo owner is part of his general authorityas servant of the Shipowner，and therefore（）will be liable if the master abuses his powers.

If the Shipowner proves that prima facie the cause of damage was excepted，the burden ofproof shifts to（）.