The master is not bound to show in the bill of lading（）of the goods shipped on board his vessel.

The master cannot sue（）freight where he signs bill of lading merely as the Shipowner’s agent.

The bill of lading is prima facie evidence（）the quantity of goods alleged to have been shipped has been shipped in fact.

It has never been settled whether delivery of a bill of lading which is marked non-negotiable （）title.

If the indorsee of a bill of lading sells the goods and re-indorses the bill of lading，he ceases（）responsible for liabilities under the contract.

The most accurate account of cargo on board will be found in the（）.

The liability（）freight reserved in the bill of lading is primarily on the shipper of the goods，unless he was merely acting as agent and made this clear at the time.

The person who signs the bill of lading without the authority of the Shipowner stating that goods have been shipped，and they have in fact not been shipped at all，（）liable to an indorsee of the bill of lading，who has relied on that statement，for damages for breach of warranty of authority.

The master can refuse to（）in the bill of lading the statements required by the Act if either he has reasonable grounds for suspecting that the information given by the shipper is inaccurate，or he has no reasonable means of checking it.

In no case（）to function as a document of title.